Assessment and grading
What still measures a student’s own ability when AI can draft an exam answer or a memo, and how to change grading without making it less reliable.
Law schools have to decide what AI means for them. Make those decisions on evidence.
AI can now write much of the work law students are taught and graded on, and it is changing what new lawyers do on the job. Legal Education AI Advisory helps law school leaders decide how to respond in assessment, curriculum and policy, using published research, the school’s own data, and a process faculty will trust.
Book a 30-minute conversationWhat I help with
Curriculum and the skills needed to practice
What graduates need to do well in public interest and government work, solo and small-firm practice and large firms, and where AI changes that.
Faculty decisions
Setting up and running an AI working group that reaches decisions the faculty can stand behind.
Your school’s own evidence
Analysis of your exams, grades, course choices and outcomes, so decisions rest on your students rather than national averages.
Why work with me
I build AI systems
I design and ship production AI and machine-learning systems, so my advice reflects what the tools actually do today, not what vendors or headlines claim.
I separate evidence from opinion
Every recommendation comes with its sources, how strong they are, and what they don’t settle.
I design for adoption
A plan faculty won’t use is worthless. I start from how decisions are made at your school now.
Every school is starting from a different place. Tell me where yours is.
Start a conversation